uyzstvqs 21 hours ago
When is Reddit going to get fined? There's no transparency or reason in content moderation, no consistently enforced ToS, no appeal mechanism, and they're very aggressive in stopping public access to public data. Seems a bit more relevant than blue checkmarks.
rideontime 17 hours ago
These are very different from the reasons listed in the article.
nabla9 22 hours ago
In the news:

X hit with $140 million EU fine for breaching content rules, TikTok settles https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulat...

- First penalty under landmark EU digital legislation

- TikTok avoids fine with transparency concessions, EU says

- EU's tech chief: X fine proportionate, not about censorship

- US has accused EU of targeting American companies

Politico.eu: EU slaps €120M fine on Elon Musk’s X, straining ties with US https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-slaps-e120m-fine-on-x-str...

Euronews: European Commission hits Elon Musk’s social network X with €120 million fine https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/12/05/european-commi...

CNBC: EU regulators hit Elon Musk’s X with 120 million euro fine for breaching bloc’s social media law https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/05/eu-regulators-hit-elon-musks...

frumplestlatz 20 hours ago
> On X, anyone can pay to obtain the ‘verified' status without the company meaningfully verifying who is behind the account, making it difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with.

Caveat emptor. Sounds like the EU wants to push privacy-invading KYC requirements.

> … and the failure to provide access to public data for researchers.

That’s a wild thing to try to force a company to do with our data. And I deeply suspect they’d use that data to justify more reasons to engage in regulatory lawfare against sites like X.

The entire complaint reads as remarkably invasive. I think it’s time for the US to put the EU and UK regulatory class back in their place. How about we withhold $X*100 dollars in NATO spending for every $X dollars they fine a US company under laws like this.

TZubiri 16 hours ago
> Caveat emptor. Sounds like the EU wants to push privacy-invading KYC requirements.

No, X wants to do that, or at least wants the benefit of pretending to offer it without the respondibility. Historically twitter offered blue checkmarks, now they offer it without verifying, simple as, it's a scam

frumplestlatz 15 hours ago
Previously it was a status symbol for people they approved of.

Now they offer blue checkmarks basically meaning “this person has a paid subscription and is probably human”.

Where’s the scam?

TZubiri 12 hours ago
https://x.com/fakealber

Here is an account I just found, it fakes being the ex president of Argentina.

It has a blue check mark, the name is that of the president, it has his picture, and in tweets it appears as if it were him.

dmix 11 hours ago
It says fake in the @ username, their listed name, and says "parodia" in the bio

> You may not impersonate other identities of individuals, groups, or organizations to deceive others. Although you are not required to display your real identity on your profile, your account should not use false profile information to impersonate others. We allow compliant Parody, Commentary, and Fan (PCF) accounts on X only if the purpose is to discuss, satirize or share information.

https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/authenticity

kodisha 20 hours ago
Why is this commend downvoted? What is false here?
frumplestlatz 16 hours ago
It’s not surprising that it inspires ire, even if that wasn’t my intent.

It’s a politically charged subject, and I’m taking a polarizing, US-centric, anti-regulatory position towards free speech, on top of my suggestion of using NATO funding as leverage to advance US speech policy.

Plus, a lot of people feel a great deal of partisan ill-will towards X and Elon Musk, irrespective of any of these issues.