tptacek 13 hours ago
Besides the obvious privacy concern: at the very least in my state (Illinois), it's not lawful for public bodies to disclose the license plate numbers read from ALPR cameras, so this data set is necessarily incomplete.

But, give it a year or two, and you can replace this whole website with a black background and 72 point white bold text "YES".

diydsp 6 hours ago
Rule 1. Do not comply in advance. Do not accept it as inevitable. Do not give away your power without friction.
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2 hours ago
tptacek writes on here sometimes about their activity in local politics. This perspective (from my reading) is that it has a lot of strong support that is difficult to oppose, not that we should give up. Read "give it a year or two" as "give it a year or two of things going as they are".
potato3732842 14 minutes ago
He also lives in a "nice" suburb of Chicago IIRC

I strongly suspect a neighborhood in Chicago composed of the kind of demographics the "nice" suburb's residents are worried about would have a very different take on the issue.

And by "strongly suspect" I mean "know because I live in that kind of neighborhood in a different city in a different state".

hibf 12 minutes ago
You're right that the dataset is incomplete, but it contains searches done by police, not plates read by Flock.

The search logs are public record even when alpr data is not; quite a few come from IL.

sp332 2 hours ago
In New Hampshire, we banned both public and private ALPRs. You can see on the map that the only ones are at toll booths. Those got explicit exemptions in the law.
dehrmann 19 minutes ago
Isn't that the state with license plates that say "live free or die?" Unless, of course, you have a moral objection to that statement, cf. Wooley v. Maynard.
mycall 4 hours ago
* While our most recent data is from 12/4/2025, there may be significant historical gaps.

* Most agencies don't proactively publish audit logs Records requests can take months or years to fulfill Some agencies heavily redact their logs

* We may not have requested logs from your local agencies yet

hopelite 10 hours ago
There is already case law that makes the records collected by government through these methods no different than any other public records, especially since they are publicly visible license plate numbers.

That has its own problems because it shields/deflects from the bigger issue of being treasonous, i.e., grotesque violation of the law of the Constitution, through mass surveillance that has also already been abused for various kinds of criminal acts by law enforcement.

calvinmorrison 13 hours ago
Flock is a private company, right. That's the whole schtick. Like, Flock can retain records indefinitely for example, they may sell those records to the government but they're a private party.
dehrmann 17 minutes ago
Would they be subject to CCPA, then?
tptacek 13 hours ago
What's your point? To the extent they're a private company you're even less likely to get access to records from Flock ALPR cameras.
bigbuppo 13 hours ago
Just because the records created on behalf of the government are held by a private enterprise doesn't mean they aren't government records.
tptacek 12 hours ago
Right, I agree. My point is that the FOIA laws of many states forbid disclosing the data this web page purports to surface.
specialist 7 hours ago
Yes but: Privatization is an effective way to negate the public's right know.

eg Some companies have claimed trade secret protections to prevent public access. Infamously, election administration vendors like Diebold.

I imagine anyone trying to investigate govt activities conducted by Palantir (for example) will run into similar stonewalling. Even getting the fulltext of contracts can be challenging.

diydsp 5 hours ago
Not automatically. There's aleeady case law(0x1) that ruled that images captured by Flock ALPR cameras are public records, even though the data are stored by Flock (a private vendor), not directly by the city.

The court rejected the notion that “because the data sits on a private server, it’s not a public record.” Instead, it said that since the surveillance is paid for by the public (taxpayers) and used by a public agency, the data must comply with the state’s public-records law.

This shows that — in at least one jurisdiction — using a private company to run ALPRs doesn’t shield the data from public-records requests.

(0x1) https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/washington-court-rules...

calvinmorrison 13 hours ago
> at the very least in my state (Illinois), it's not lawful for public bodies to disclose the license plate numbers read from ALPR cameras, so this data set is necessarily incomplete.

They're not a public body, that was my point

hopelite 10 hours ago
They de facto are because they only place cameras in public places and on public land by contract with the government in one form or another; be it with a treasonous sheriff or a treasonous state executive and legislature. The public would not be talking about Flock if they had not worked to create a treasonous surveillance state and instead only did things like monitored truck movements in a logistics depot. The private contracts for things like HOA neighborhoods and corporations, e.g., big box store loss prevention and customer data tracking, but those’s are a totally different issue that have nothing to do with the use of public funds and power for mass surveillance.
RHSeeger 10 hours ago
This feels a lot like "Yeah, but we'll do it anyways until a court makes us stop; because the profit is more than the fine"
immibis 7 hours ago
but thry're not literally the government and the relevant laws only affect the literal government.
svnt 4 hours ago
No, there is legal precedent that private companies who perform government services are subject to the same laws.
tptacek 60 minutes ago
This is generally not the case.
ifh-hn 9 hours ago
Since the page is currently down and I have no idea what flocked means in the context of license plates, can I assume this is US specific?
KomoD 9 hours ago
"Flock Safety" is a company that makes "ALPR" cameras (automated license plate recognition, in reality they go far beyond just reading license plates), they've been getting a lot of attention recently because people are worried about privacy and abuse.

There's a bunch of articles about them here: https://www.404media.co/tag/flock/

stanac 8 hours ago
I would also recommend Benn Jordan's YT channel, he has a couple of videos covering flock cameras. His latest one is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY

edit: grammar

monksy 2 hours ago
Unrelated but he's been getting threats of violence. I'm not sure whats going on with that.
junon 6 hours ago
I love Benn Jordan. If you liked this one, go check out the one where he stores a JPEG inside of a living bird.

https://youtu.be/hCQCP-5g5bo?si=K_TGBR6FNpjI0qFk

reactordev 6 hours ago
jeroenhd 2 hours ago
That website is a bit misleading, their "worldwide" map includes ALL ALPR cameras, not just the ones operated by Flock or for-profit surveillance companies.

The ones on their map near my location are all for automatic license plate recognition to enter parking garages. Not exactly the dystopian nightmare their homepage warned me about.

hibf 9 minutes ago
You assume those aren't logged and accessible by the government. They are.
lillecarl 3 hours ago
This is dystopian as fuck
iso1631 5 hours ago
ANPR cameras which the rest of the world (and apparently America) have had for decades have recently become big news in America, I believe because they're now being used for immigration purposes?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number-plate_recogni...

I'm not sure why these are so bad but generally everyone loves things like Ring cameras which do the same thing but with people rather than vehicles. I suspect there's something in the American Psyche and how they treat cars, and the inherent trust of the billionaires and distrust of "The Feds"

rescripting 5 hours ago
It’s trivial for law enforcement to track your movement with ALPR cameras. Information feeds into a single database, paid for by law enforcement agencies, and they just connect the dots.

Ring camera footage requires law enforcement to get a warrant or for individuals to give consent to supply the footage.

Now tell me which system makes it easier for a cop to stalk their ex.

thih9 4 hours ago
All this is assuming one travels exclusively by car. Bikes, public transport, or walking are not as easy to track using this system.

Then again, these modes of transport are less popular in the US; I guess such a surveillance system is extra effective in the US because of that.

Spooky23 2 hours ago
Not yet. Facical recognition in 2025 is where LPR was in 2010.

As the cost of compute and wireless communications continues to drop, facial recognition will be prolific. There are more limitations with cameras, but AI will make it easy to backtrack movement to a place where they get a clean shot that can identify you.

As an example, the transit authority in NYC Metro was able to plug existing security feeds from trains into Amazon Rekognition to count heads, which feeds their ticketing app — you can see which carriages are full. As time goes on, they’ll become able to track the breadcrumbs individuals from seat to platform. (If not already)

Detectives do this manually today. I was on a jury where the purse snatcher was followed by various cameras until he got on a bus. They pulled the bus passes and tracked his pass back to his girlfriend.

hibf 7 minutes ago
This automated already, and you don't need a face. Flock does it.

https://haveibeenflocked.com/news/reid

garciasn 3 hours ago
Less popular because it’s not feasible for many. I live in MN. Biking 20mi to work when it’s -10F and in 6” of fresh snow on top of the 12” received so far this season just isn’t something that’s safe to do.

Please don’t make it seem like it’s a “popularity” thing; it’s a necessity thing.

thih9 2 hours ago
Finland is a cold country with similar size and area. For national domestic trips, 55% of people there use cars[1]. For MN i only found stats for MN metro area, but I’d expect public transport to be more developed there. The car usage is still 83%[2].

[1]: https://www.traficom.fi/sites/default/files/media/publicatio... page 6

[2]: https://metropolitan-council.github.io/TBI_Household_Synthes... “Driving remains the predominant mode of travel in the region, representing 83% of trips in 2023.”

antiframe 2 hours ago
I bet the local community plows the roads but not the bike infrastructure, though? I get why, people probably drive more than bike.

But, in Canada, there are local communities that plow bike infrastructure and locals bike in their deep winter.

It's a chicken or egg problem of building infrastructure for users and users demanding infrastructure. It's not some fact of nature that it's impossible. Different communities have different priorities. So, necessity is a bit strong of a word.

iso1631 2 hours ago
Hardly anyone lives in MN - half the poulation of New York City alone.

The vast majority of Americans live in cities. Half live in just 8 metro-areas, just as the vast majority of Europeans live in cities. Europe is far more dispersed though.

mananaysiempre 3 hours ago
> public transport

Some European cities I remember having pervasive cameras in public transport a decade ago, ostensibly to prosecute vandals.

SauciestGNU 3 hours ago
There was an article posted recently announcing that Flock reached an agreement with Amazon to ingest Ring cameras into their system.
Spooky23 3 hours ago
Most ring users contribute their data and no warrant is required. If they don’t, the majority of people are cooperative.

Ring is problematic in some ways but doesn’t produce trivially searchable metadata.

ifh-hn 4 hours ago
This comment went right off a cliff at the end...
saint_yossarian 4 hours ago
Why do you think so?

LOVEINT is indeed a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOVEINT

ifh-hn 4 hours ago
I know it's a thing.

That was just my reaction reading the OP.

First paragraph: reasonable, if ignoring that access it not likely to be unrestricted willy-nilly.

Second paragraph: not as reasonable given that Amazon likely comply without issue with us intelligence, and sell the data to third parties, which the police could just buy (similar has been done) to avoid consent or legal obstacles.

Third paragraph: out of nowhere, focus on police. No mention of intelligence agency staff or say Amazon staff doing the same thing.

I just had a wee chuckle to myself was all.

Dusseldorf 3 hours ago
Out of nowhere? The entire comment is talking about law enforcement (police) and law enforcement agencies (police departments) purchasing access to commercially owned surveillance databases. No warrant is required to use them, and in some cases that access is indeed "unrestricted willy-nilly."
sigwinch 2 hours ago
I think the logic totally follows, if your ex is a cop and you’re thinking of getting a Ring camera.
lingrush4 3 hours ago
If a police officer potentially stalking his ex is the worst failure mode this guy can come up with, let's keep the Flock cameras.

With the right access controls and approval processes, that can be fully solved in a week.

hansvm 3 hours ago
Ah, you mean like if we had some sort of knowledgeable, impartial third-party to grant the police permissions. They could, get this, "judge" whether the absolute bare minimum of evidence is likely to exist. So long as Flock didn't provide a way to circumvent an approval process like that, you could maybe reduce the instances of abusers stalking their victims to "acceptable" levels.

What do you think the chances are that we could invent a system like that? You don't think Flock and the police would find a way to circumvent it do you?

slickdifferent 4 hours ago
I think it's mostly just a privacy issue. The idea that your every movement is being recorded by the government is Orwellian, especially when they try to hide its existence, lie about its capabilities, and you have no say in the matter (referencing NSA metadata monitoring). The average person thinks their ring camera is like their coffee maker, an individual piece of technology they own and control. If it were released that everyone's ring cameras were being fed into some NSA program running facial recognition to track citizens movement I'm sure they would be upset about that too.
iso1631 2 hours ago
But these cameras have been around for 30+ years, including in the US. Why is it suddenly in the news.

The cameras don't track me either. They track a car. They have no idea who is driving the car.

> If it were released that everyone's ring cameras were being fed into some NSA program running facial recognition to track citizens movement I'm sure they would be upset about that too

That's the interesting bit, how did ANPR get into the US public consciousness now, rather than over a decade ago when it started to be used on toll roads

lynx97 3 hours ago
Did you somehow miss the introduction of mobile phones? Came out of a coma recently?
xandrius 3 hours ago
Because people started caring about something, we're going to mock them because they don't care about something else too?

Let people slowly get interested in protecting their privacy; as they say, better late than never!

airstrike 41 minutes ago
Unless I'm missing something, Ring cameras film people at my doorstep and are for my personal use, so dont know how they're similar at all even if you don't trust Amazon
Spooky23 3 hours ago
They’ve gotten cheaper and aggregated into nationwide networks. The older devices were expensive and in police car scenarios required pretty significant effort to install. The mobile flock just gets bolted to the dash.

In my city, most vehicular movement between neighborhoods and in/out of the city is logged. Your safety and civil liberties are dependent on agencies following and auditing their work rules, as the law didn’t anticipate this gives them a lot of discretion.

Workaccount2 2 hours ago
Americans (the general public) are a lot more weary of government surveillance than other developed nations. Its one thing that you can get a lot of liberals and conservative to agree on.

Unlike ring cameras which people voluntarily install and the government needs a warrant to access, flock cameras are pretty much exclusively for the government to actively monitor citizens without any court oversight.

iso1631 2 hours ago
People install ring cameras which record me walking past. Those cameras then push the data to private companies for processing, and are made available to police on a simple request.

ANPR has been a thing for 30 years. Is America just slow on the uptake? Even then it looks like they've been in use for a long time there.

Workaccount2 26 minutes ago
>and are made available to police on a simple request.

That's a "santa claus for adults" rumor.

Ring only complies with requests that they are legally obligated to. Otherwise users need to voluntarily share the footage, which more often than not they do.

pilingual 13 hours ago
Put up billboards around metros with a license plate reader that queries this database with each passing car and announce "White Tesla Model Y XYZ-1234 You've been focked for: Inv"

What a sick society we live in.

potato3732842 9 minutes ago
That'd be a great place to test one's plate for legibility to the toll and speed cameras.
VoidWhisperer 12 hours ago
This unfortunately wouldn't work quite as well in states where cars arent required to have a front facing license plate (like florida)
kmoser 11 hours ago
The camera could be separate from the billboard, and point at the backs of the cars. The billboard would be a short distance past that.
overfeed 9 hours ago
Flock cameras are oriented to read rear plates. One would need a camera similarly configured + a billboard some distance in front, or perhaps 2 billboards, a 1-2 setup + payoff combo, the camera behind the first billboard, and the dynamic text on the second. Pulling up other public data correlated to the plate - where legal - may make a splash. I'm thinking addressing the car owner by their first name.
johnebgd 12 hours ago
Dystopian society.
ourmandave 4 hours ago
Visit deflock.me/map to see if you live near a camera.

https://deflock.me/map

iJohnDoe 3 hours ago
Holy shit! I had no idea they were everywhere!

Do they get permission or permit to install them?

blamazon 3 hours ago
Some are installed on private property, and supply data to the property owner. Some are installed on public property, and supply data to the government.
nh43215rgb 12 hours ago
> You cannot access this site because the owner has reached their plan limits. Check back later once traffic has gone down.

> If you are owner of this website, prevent this from happening again by upgrading your plan on the Cloudflare Workers dashboard.

xer0x 12 hours ago
Cloudflare making sites unavailable?
tossit444 11 hours ago
No, Workers free tier is 100,000 requests/day. Considering the error is on the main page, each visit is probably taking a minimum of 10+ requests, so it can easily be overwhelmed.
eastbound 9 hours ago
This is genius if you work in B2C and want to prevent your website from going viral.
NewJazz 9 hours ago
Does Cloudflare let you set hard limits when you are on a paid plan? Or they just do it for the free tier?
wongarsu 5 hours ago
No, the paid plan scales to infinity (without having to beg for limit increases like on some other clouds). But ther paid plan has a $5/month base fee, so it's tempting to stay in the free plan if you don't expect to go viral
beeflet 11 hours ago
Have I been cloudflare'd?
gotekom952 9 hours ago
Very problematic flock security video - how easy is to hack them https://youtu.be/uB0gr7Fh6lY?si=vC2Kyl_e30kVVmXT
DivingForGold 3 hours ago
A met a guy once whom drives a PU truck, he lowers the tailgate and places an oversized piece of plywood in the bed as an excuse, he also places an opaque plastic cover over his front lic plate, which has been raised to a $300 fine in Texas, if caught. He now intends to place a series of bright strobe lights around his front plate to "bleach out" the sensors of these spy cameras.
pxc 2 hours ago
> He now intends to place a series of bright strobe lights around his front plate to "bleach out" the sensors of these spy cameras.

Isn't this a safety hazard?

DonHopkins 35 minutes ago
Does he drive a hotdog shaped car?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLfAf8oHrMo

morkalork 2 hours ago
Is his name Rusty Shackelford by any chance?
dwoldrich 2 hours ago
Now imagine every other aspect of modern life is enshittified similarly to some extent and all being dialed up. Nothing is sacred, and talk to the contrary is laughable. Government is a scummy grift, every big (money) cause is full of unaudited scammers. I hope you are never passionate about a pet government policy!

You can buy local or do it yourself, but all of those are squeezed at the margins by enshittified inputs.

Before even seeking to fix the problem, I try to work on me.

First, I try (difficult) to not be sucked into useless wallowing, which keeps me exactly where the enemy wants me to be. I tend to skim 'news' headlines now, if that.

Second, in my career I strive to produce uncommon quality so as to not add to the problem.

I love to stand out and feel proud of my work. It makes me sad when coworkers are concerned/confused when I put in extra effort. I know where they're coming from. No one notices nor cares at $megacorp, and my work is internal and humble.

I do it for self-improvement and to make the time I spend working for them worthwhile to me.

smackay 2 hours ago
You forgot to mention personal integrity and setting a good example to others.
dwoldrich 57 minutes ago
You make a great point! Setting a good example by being ambitious creates the Pygmalion Effect. The unavoidable contagion of repeated improvement making people hungry for more.

I also find everyone is hungry for kudos. I recommend being very liberal and publicly vocal with genuine kudos if you have them!

GaryBluto 11 hours ago
Slashdotted within 3 hours.
asveikau 11 hours ago
Now there's a term I haven't heard in a while
ChrisMarshallNY 8 hours ago
Yup.

Nowadays, we say “hugged to death.”

nosianu 8 hours ago
Hacker-Noosed
hellothereworld 3 hours ago
You can search with „OUTATIME“. For any non-americans lurking in the comments.
amelius 3 hours ago
License plate numbers are old fashioned. Can't we get something more secure? E.g. plate numbers that change every hour would be a good start. I don't like to drive around with a giant cookie strapped to my car.
opengrass 13 hours ago
Have I ran out of 100,000 requests?
WalterSear 13 hours ago
Does your significant other know about your car collection? You may have a car hoarding problem.
jmward01 10 hours ago
I wonder if I got a license plate holder that said 'I do not consent to selling my position information' if I could sue them.
7e 10 hours ago
You have no right to privacy in public, at least in the US.
diydsp 5 hours ago
That is oft-repeated, but case law is starting to show it's not strictly true:

See Mosaic + Carpenter case which say “Yes, each scan is public; yes, aggregation is different. "

Carpenter shows the Court recognizes that aggregated location data can be constitutionally significant.

Individual observability vs. systemic observation: A passerby can note a single plate at a single place/time. But a system of ALPRs, distributed spatially and continuous in time, indexed and retained, can map a person’s entire movements, associations, repeated visits, and behavioral patterns. That’s exactly the “mosaic” insight: the whole reveals things the pieces don’t. (Maynard / Jones reasoning).

edot 5 hours ago
But don’t I have a right to not get stalked?
ecb_penguin 46 minutes ago
Yes of course you do. If you're being stalked, contact your local police department.
__del__ 9 hours ago
clarity is good. i believe that was a reference to the futility of posting "i do not consent" messages on social media.
The_President 4 hours ago
Flock creates a dossier that allows an individual to be stalked and framed. This permits rouge users clamoring for more power to consolidate their toolkit and expedite their rise.

People get framed and stolen from all the time and this will certainly make it worse.

herpdyderp 4 hours ago
Are you talking about the linked website or Flock itself?
The_President 3 hours ago
fixed
habinero 14 hours ago
I love these kinds of sites, since they're indistinguishable from honeypots. Sure, have my license plate and the information that I'm worried about being watched.
AdmiralAsshat 13 hours ago
With no other identifying info, though, what can they do with a license plate number in isolation?
potato3732842 5 minutes ago
Flag you as being worth watching, or up your composite score by a point or whatever.
dragonwriter 11 hours ago
> With no other identifying info, though, what can they do with a license plate number in isolation?

For typical users not taking extra precautions, visiting a page in a browser is providing additional identifying info, a fact that monetization of the free-as-in-beer web relies heavily upon, but which can be leveraged in other ways, e.g., by a site that draws you in with privacy fears as a technique to get you to submit additional information that can be correlated with it.

pests 13 hours ago
Some states, like Michigan, you can request owner information (including address) by a in-person SOS visit and $15 a plate. I've always thought this should be PII and shouldn't be allowed on reddit, for example, where PII is banned. Post a driver with plate in Michigan and you may have doxxed them.
747fulloftapes 7 hours ago
This is intentionally not PII. You accept this burden when you decide to register a vehicle.

Keep in mind you don't need to have a license plate or to register a vehicle to drive it only on private property.

Your license plate is required to be readily visible so that it can be used to find out who the registered and, presumably, responsible party is.

Consider if you skip out on paying for parking at a garage, where you agreed to pay the fee by parking there in the first place. How is the business supposed to identify you to collect the money owed?

Otherwise, how else would automatic private toll roads know where to send the bill?

In Michigan, I believe the law only permits someone to request registration details for certain listed reasons. They don't verify that, but if you're caught submitting a fraudulent request, you can get in trouble - I don't know if it's a fine or crime. Probably depends on the circumstance.

PS Hello from Grand Rapids!

potato3732842 3 minutes ago
You can screech about "not a right" all you want but there's federal law (DDPA) that limits how easily states can reveal driver's PII. Usually a documented business purpose (i.e sending spam mail) is required.

This Michigan thing sounds like it walks right up to the line if not over it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2721

antonvs 8 hours ago
> Some states, like Michigan, you can request owner information (including address)

If the car is leased, wouldn’t this just give leasing company details?

747fulloftapes 7 hours ago
No, because while the leasing company may own the vehicle (known as the title holder) the vehicle will be registered in the lesser's name (known as the registered owner.)

In the case of a car purchased with financing like a loan, I believe the purchaser will be both the title and registered owner, but the lender will have a lien on the vehicle until the debt is paid off.

antonvs 7 hours ago
Ah thanks.

Permanent rental it is then. :)

747fulloftapes 7 hours ago
That, or, establish a trust to own the vehicle and grant yourself permission to use it. It's not exactly trivial to do and costs some money, but it's doable.

You can do similar with an LLC, but that gets more complicated with the rules regarding using a "company" vehicle for personal purposes. IANAL

Similar things are done for things like cellphone plans, firearm ownership, homes, etc.

The only thing I am aware of that you can only do in your own name is register to vote. Almost all of the Michigan voter database can be FOIA'd. It's called the QVF - qualified voter file. Only a few fields in the database (ie, day and month of birth) as well as all voter records for victoms domestic battery are protected by statute.

kotaKat 4 hours ago
Pay a thousand bucks to a Montana agent to register you an pseudoanonymous LLC and put an old 90s Corolla into an LLC with a permanent registration plate (since anything 15+ years old can have a 'perm' plate on it.

Then never think about it again.

747fulloftapes 3 hours ago
While some people do get away with this, it carries some risk.

Without using an LLC, most every state requires you to register your vehicle where you live within 30-90 days with some exceptions (ie college students).

Even with the LLC, if you catch the attention of the state, I believe you might be risking being charged with tax evasion even if your goal was to protect your privacy. This is especially true if you can't prove the LLC to be a legitimate business venture.

Yeah, the Corolla won't be mistaken for a supercar, but many states have begun cracking down on residents with Montana plates such as Georgia, Ohio, and New York.

Also, insuring a car with out of state registration can be committing insurance fraud. Rates and fees are different between states due to different regulations. Further, depending on your policy, the insurer could deny claims because the car wasn't garaged in the state it was registered.

Really, if the privacy is of sufficient priority, the best solution is to just do things properly and move to rural Montana instead.

edm0nd 8 hours ago
You just work backwards.

Here's what I would do working off just a single license plate number w OSINT.

I would pivot immediately into license plate databases that have been breached. For example, ParkMobile got popped in 2021 and the db has 20.9M license plates in it. prob have low success rate and iirc its pretty US centric. It has their full name, address, phone, email, all kinda data.

If you had paid fancy tools, like Lexis Nexis, you could plug it into there and easily find the owner.

There are also plenty of license plate look sites online where it will tell you the VIN and make/model details.

Idk, would just take digging and keep spidering out with all new info you find. Would yield a few hits eventually.

monerozcash 7 hours ago
Sure, and so what? You can look up people on Accurint without license plates. Depending on what kind of account you have, you can just search by a zip code, or a state with no further identifiers.

What would be the point of running a website collecting the license plate numbers of random visitors?

diydsp 5 hours ago
You need to think more evil!

Lets brainstorm!

Theres a parking lot... what are the 10 wealthiest car owners...and the 10 frailest oldest people... or maybe the 20 women aged 19-25 blond under 150 pounds... and when do they get off work tired, drive home each day? What's the most isolated gas station,convenience store they stop at? Ones where few other cars pass by? Who's homes don't show a 2nd car in driveway? Owned by 6'5" 200 pound man? Who frequently visits a karate studio?

Or: im a car salesman, in comes a customer, whining abt lowering the price bc Theyre broke... lemme just look up where they eat supper every night! How much time they spend at airports! What school they drop off their kids! Who comes to their house? Nannies? Oh look drug dealers, i can threaten them with blackmail!

Sound ridiculous? All the data brings it into focus. A local detective told me theyre focusing on robberies of $ethnicity restaurants bc that group stockpiles cash in their homes...

And this is all assuming good info, but when u get creative:

..what if we look for mistakes... hey that annoying $religious neighbor pissed me off with his loud music. His kids car shows up as visiting thr wrong side of town..probably a wrong digit but lets report him anyway!!!

Or: Hey lets scan all the wifi dbs for ssids that seem like defaults, then offer them csam-insurance: you pay me $1000 cash rn and ill insure i dont browse csam from your network! And my alpr data says when youre home and your iot devs tell me when you go to sleep so we'll slip it in at before-bed-wank-time!

monerozcash 4 hours ago
Oh no, I can think very evil. I just don't see what kind of evil thinking would arrive at "Hey lets use this website to collect IP address/license plate pairs at a small scale"

That just doesn't strike me as a very efficient way of doing evil.

You can just go on accurint and find the oldest people living alone in the richest neighbourhoods near you. You can even fairly reliably find out whether or not they have living relatives.

All this deeply sensitive data is already readily available. I don't think IP+license plate data would be particularly interesting unless you're Google and able to gather that at an absolutely massive scale. But even then, you'd be using it for extremely boring kinds of evil.

rightbyte 7 hours ago
Pairing IPs to persons?
monerozcash 7 hours ago
You can just get an API which does that and skip the middle steps?

Or even skip the API part and just buy that data in bulk. Or just collect it from a variety of freely leaked databases.

JohnFen 5 hours ago
In many states, car registration data is public information. If you have a license plate number, you can easily look up who the car is registered to, where they live, etc. License plate numbers are PII.
ccgreg 12 hours ago
Most people park at their home and many drive to work. If you have both of those data points, you can identify people.
mertd 12 hours ago
That's not very useful?

For homeowners, the real estate transactions are public and majority of white collar people have LinkedIn accounts.

ccgreg 11 hours ago
So, from home and work, you identify me. Then you figure out which church I attend, and which strip club I attend.
interloxia 9 hours ago
"Wait, user compliance scan identified location traces associated with participitation in community groups prohibited by EasyLife Health™ policy update 2025-12-06b. Recommend to annul contract."
jwiz 12 hours ago
You're starting with the plate, getting the home, and then you can get the real estate info.

Most people don't expect their identity to be discoverable from their driving.

Ylpertnodi 9 hours ago
Isn't that the whole idea of licence plates? So you're identifiable?
ragequittah 9 hours ago
Wait really? I feel like this was happening in the 90s. Now every car has a full gps spy system integrated to the point I barely trust that my conversation is private in a modern vehicle. But I guess if you think it's just your car company, Android, Apple, roadside assistance, the local police, and probably the music you're playing that can pin your location you're probably ok.
drnick1 12 hours ago
> majority of white collar people have LinkedIn accounts.

What a time to live in!

hopelite 10 hours ago
LinkedIn has always struck me like a kind of contemporary slave management/market place, only one in which pick-mes try to be the best alpha slave they can be.

The fact that you are linked in, as in a chain, sure does not help with dispelling my impression.

rogerrogerr 13 hours ago
Exactly - you can collect license plates numbers way easier than this. The best data they can really get is a connection to an IP address.
amazingman 11 hours ago
Checksum?
CamperBob2 13 hours ago
Sell it to the cops and/or ICE as belonging to "self-identified persons of interest."
MangoToupe 11 hours ago
Surely this implies that the easiest route to pedophilia is to join ICE
blitzar 6 hours ago
Reminds me of the (legit) form to claim compensation for a privacy leak.

Put in your name, address, phone number, dob, ssn and bank details - we will post you a cheque for $2.50

boringg 4 hours ago
100% always feels like a trap.
boomboomsubban 13 hours ago
They list their sources, if you care but don't trust them you could replicate it on your own.
RobRivera 14 hours ago
Lmao I got honeypotted in h.s. by one of those 'does your crush like you' astrology sites
hopelite 10 hours ago
I totally understand your sentiment, but you could just check a random assortment of license plate numbers you collected while driving around, which also includes yours. At the very least that would effectively obfuscate your license plate sufficiently that it could not be attributed beyond other methods that likely already have done so.
MangoToupe 13 hours ago
Who isn't worried about being watched? I am certainly not confident the government can tell their ass from their face, so anyone could be suspect.
Simulacra 14 hours ago
Sounds like social media ;-)
alilikestech 13 hours ago
Lol I actually tried it with my plate, i hope i don't get SWATed
bix6 13 hours ago
Interesting I can’t access this over VPN
ccgreg 13 hours ago
Well, yeah. Clownflare
mfkp 12 hours ago
Seems like the website has ran out of cloudflare worker credits on their plan:

  Please check back later
  Error 1027
  This website has been temporarily rate limited
user3939382 13 hours ago
Can’t wait for the Flock Equifax/SouthParkWereSorry-esque breach announcement any day. I should start a betting pool w my friends.
khannn 9 hours ago
Hello, we at Flock are very sad to announce that your data was leaked, but due to the fact that we operate in a legal grey area to get around laws and are nothing more than the domestic surveillance equivalent to a PMC operating overseas, we invite you get fucked
Pikamander2 8 hours ago
No worries; after Flock gets breached, you'll be compensated with one free year of their services.
bigbuppo 13 hours ago
I've got $10 on compromised six months before they had their first customer.
pilingual 13 hours ago
If YouTube personalities can break into the hardware, I wouldn't be surprised if foreign intelligence has already figured out a way. Clownin
hopelite 10 hours ago
Why would they break into individual hardware when they have unfettered access to the whole system in certain countries’ cases and can likely just hack into it in more adversarial cases? It is one of the several reasons why … yes, I know YC backed and funded Flock … the company and everyone in government that contracts for them to provide this mass surveillance service, is objectively and inherently treasonous. But don’t shoot the messenger just because people don’t like the message.

“Whoopsie, my negligence I shouldn’t have been engaging in in the first place” is no exemption from being a traitor, betrayal.

What that means for society and if and what it does about it is a different question. Based on historical trends, it all probably won’t matter since we’ve clearly crossed a threshold and the “PPP” tyranny (different from the trillion dollars in PPP loans that were forgiven and contributed to the inflation) is upon us because it wasn’t prevented when it still could have been.

I don’t think people here are even tracking what is going on in TX, UT, LA (and soon to be nation wide); where as of Jan 1st all new accounts will have to provide government ID to install any app on a mobile device.

kotaKat 4 hours ago
My breach compensation will be my choice of 3 Flock Cameras from any location in the US with a pole saw.
dev_l1x_be 9 hours ago
Have I been HNed? [Yes] No
BlarfMcFlarf 6 hours ago
I mean, we already had PRISM, why is anyone acting like this is a big deal?
basilgohar 6 hours ago
It's a big deal even if it's been happening for a while. It should not be something we shrug our shoulders to and move on. These are stepping stones to a greater police state.
kazinator 10 hours ago
Have I been flocculated? Check your social security number to see whether you are considered pond scum.
onetokeoverthe 14 hours ago
just enter 10 license numbers.
chzblck 4 hours ago
Oh no my super secret license plate! definitely something that is normally hidden instead of being on the front and back of my car for anyone to see and photo.
dietr1ch 4 hours ago
Sure, but now there's a highly vulnerable network of cameras that reports wherever you pass to everyone way beyond the few people that saw you go around.
chzblck 3 hours ago
Okay? so what. People can see that I drive? do you not think that verizon/ att /google cant see where you traveling by the phone you carry?
phyzome 4 hours ago
"Oh no, my super secret movement data, which is now being made available to a large number of people" would be more accurate.
chzblck 3 hours ago
Oh no lots people can now see that I go to costco and publix.
JimmyBiscuit 3 hours ago
Oh no youre one druggie friend (that you didnt know about having a drug addiction) that visits you sometimes got caught by the cops. Oh no they think youre their drug dealer since his license plate got recognized in your driveway a few times. Oh no they are kicking your door in with a search warrant and shoot your dog.
chzblck 3 hours ago
Downvote all you want but adtechs like magnite, ttd, and applovin Have way more personal data on you and use it to influence. I'll take safety over ads any day of the week.
driverdan 3 hours ago
It's not one or the other. Everyone should be opposed to both.
supportengineer 2 hours ago
I believe that the full weight of the nations resources should come into play whenever there are missing or abducted people. CIA, NSA, satellites, all of it. I can’t fathom while we don’t do that already. But absent of that, Flock is the next best thing. Mainly because it reduces the friction to get this information in the hands of local law-enforcement officers. I have zero tolerance for crimes against children and fully support capital punishment for such.
analogpixel 56 minutes ago
You guys really need to come up with at least ONE other reason to push every single policy besides "think of the children"; Just one to break it up a bit.
supportengineer 28 minutes ago
Well, let me ask you this. What is your expectation from society if you or your family is personally affected?
lillecarl 36 minutes ago
But think of the children!!?