https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/19/06/08/1827250/the-los...
It’s great if we have more battery chemistries. It would also be great if people would recognize that thermal runaway in lithium batteries is already a solved problem. This would enable updating fire and building regulations, and allow installation of more batteries.
Badly made Li-ion packs are a huge risk. But that’s a QA/Certification problem as with anything else (badly made charging bricks are also a risk.. don’t buy them on Temu). There have been CT scans published now showing how big a difference there is in the manufacturing of good and bad cells.
This sounds still very academic though and be aware that these things take time to industrialise. Also sometimes it doesn't pan out in the end.
The fire hazard might be reduced but of course any battery storing so much energy in a small place has some kind of hazard. Hopefully the runaway fire providing its own oxygen is solved here though, this is the main reason it's so hard to put the lithium battery fires out.
Our sea is full of sodium however.
Sodium is actually more reactive than lithium and explodes on contact with water. There's a few things that make the battery chemistry less likely to undergo thermal runaway, but sodium is not a safe metal...
Isn't the idea that it quickly dissociates water, and the hydrogen and oxygen bubble up ("explosively"?) and are easily ignited ?
And what’s the downside? More complex chemistry to make the cathode?
There's a good video I just watched that addresses the sodium battery industry and differences with current batteries: https://youtu.be/nrTCgZmUFCY